Chapter 12 · Canonical English edition

12. Proactive Action and Reflection on Action

Functional Systems Facilitation · Dmitry Shamenkov

Section 16 of 53version 1.1 · July 2026Source: Book_OD
← Book contents

12. Proactive Action and Reflection on Action

What It Is

Once the goal has been formulated, the phase of action begins — concrete steps toward it, carried out while preserving the quality of presence attained in the Practice of Silence. Communication with others becomes not automatic reaction but the holding of inner contact.

Then comes the reflection on action: What happened? What do I feel? What worked, and what did not? What did I learn? This reflection closes the systemquant’s cycle with feedback.

Carrying the State into Action

The key question of any developmental program is whether the skill being trained generalizes beyond the practice itself. One can meditate beautifully every morning and still spend the rest of the day on autopilot. Without transfer there is no real change.

Desbordes et al. (2012) found a sustained reduction in amygdala reactivity outside of meditation — evidence that the skill carries over. Wyman et al. (2010) found something even more telling: transferring emotional skills into real life requires practice under conditions of emotional activation³³. Practice in a state of rest alone does not generalize.

For this reason, proactive action sits inside the systemquant — between meditation and reflection on action. The state attained in the Practice of Silence cannot be left behind in the room. It is carried into real communication and real action, and through that it is both tested and consolidated.

Committed Action

In the psychological-flexibility model of Hayes et al. (ACT, 2012), committed action — action guided by values and undertaken with acceptance of the accompanying discomfort — is one of six central processes. The network analysis of Parker et al. (2024) found inaction to be one of the central nodes in the network of psychological problems³⁴.

This is worth pausing on. Many people assume the main problem is internal: “I first need to sort myself out, and only then act.” In practice the reverse often holds — inaction maintains the problem. Committed action, performed in contact with values and with awareness, can interrupt the avoidance cycle and is proposed within ACT as a therapeutic mechanism in its own right.

Automation Through Regularity

The science of habits shows that behavior becomes automatic as control shifts from the hippocampus-dependent (goal-directed) system to the striatum-dependent (habitual) one. The median time to automaticity is 66 days (Lally et al., 2010), with a range of 18–254 days depending on the complexity of the habit³⁵.

Performing actions with awareness, regularly, within the systemquant creates the conditions for new automatic patterns to form — and awareness gradually becomes not an effort but a habit. This is the shift from a state to a trait, expressed at the behavioral level.

Reflection on Action: Closing the Cycle

The feedback loop is the heart of any adaptive system. In the Anokhin–Sudakov theory of functional systems, reverse afferentation (the feedback signal about the result of an action) is compared with the acceptor of the result of action (the expectation). A mismatch triggers correction. Without this comparison the corrective loop cannot operate, and the system tends to repeat the same patterns.

Donald Schön (1983) distinguished two kinds of reflection³⁶:

  • Reflection-in-action — adjustment in the very course of an activity;

  • Reflection-on-action — making sense of it afterward.

Reflection on action within the systemquant is reflection-on-action. Without it the learning cycle does not close, and experience remains unintegrated. With it, every cycle of “felt → conveyed → received a response → refined → felt more precisely” becomes a self-reinforcing learning loop — in the terms of Watson and Levin (2023), a realization of the Hebbian principle in a living system³⁷.

Metaphor

Action without reflection is blind repetition. Reflection without action is endless deliberation. Only the “action — reflection” cycle creates learning. It is like walking: each step is a loss of balance corrected by the next. Stop taking steps, and you fall. Take steps without correcting, and you fall just the same.